The smart Trick of conviction attempt to murder case law pakistan That No One is Discussing
The smart Trick of conviction attempt to murder case law pakistan That No One is Discussing
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
The main objectives of police is usually to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and above all be certain regulation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is really a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents from the boy or Lady do not approve of this kind of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they can do if they are able to Minimize off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person who's a major, the few is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who presents such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to activity by instituting criminal proceedings via the police against these kinds of persons and further stern action is taken against this sort of person(s) as provided by regulation.
In case the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is often only finished if the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Inside the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence plus the petitioner company responded for the allegations as such they were well mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to become appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), along with the petitioners might seek remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it involves legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be produced and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
When the state court hearing the case reviews the regulation, he finds that, whilst it mentions large multi-tenant properties in some context, it truly is actually very obscure about whether the 90-day provision applies to all landlords. The judge, based within the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held on the 90-day notice need, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation features the names on the parties to the original case, the court in which the case was listened to, the date it had been decided, as well as book in which it truly is recorded. Different citation requirements may incorporate italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.
10. Without touching the merits on the case of your issue of annual increases inside the pensionary emoluments in the petitioner, in terms of policy decision with the provincial government, these kinds of yearly increase, if permissible while in the case of employees of KMC, calls for further assessment to generally be made from the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance on account of funding issues and deficiency of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, necessitating the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
500,000/- (Rupees Five hundred thousand only) Every single as well as same shall be retained while in the police station to the effect that no harm shall be caused for the petitioners. five. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance on the respondents that pensionary benefits may very well be withheld on account with the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section twenty on the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does present for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced. These consist of if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension can be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set with the government.
Any court may perhaps request to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to achieve a different conclusion. The validity of this type of distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment into a higher court.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case regulation previously rendered on similar cases.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, It is usually a well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, here and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.